Metacognition is a higher order thinking process responsible for active control over cognitive processes. It is an important ingredient for learning as empirical studies have shown that metacognitively aware students perform better than less aware ones. Theories of metacognition emphasize the importance of self-reflection as a means to improve one’s ability to monitor, self-direct and evaluate one’s learning processes. Some ways of including metacognition instruction in Interactive Learning Environments (ILEs) have been suggested. In practice, however, most ILEs overlook it, not least because it is very difficult to provide adequate guidance on metacognition to students. This thesis puts forth a metacognition instruction model, named the Reflection Assistant (RA), that focuses on the following metacognitive skills: (1) problem understanding and knowledge monitoring, (2) selection of metacognitive strategies, and (3) evaluation of the learning experience. The RA automatically builds a metacognitive profile of the student based on two measures: knowledge monitoring accuracy (KMA) and knowledge monitoring bias (KMB). The KMA measures the accuracy of the student’s knowledge monitoring. The KMB detects any systematic bias the student might exhibit in her knowledge monitoring, enabling us to categorize students as pessimistic, optimistic, realistic, or random.
Research Professor. Director at Learning Change Project – Research on society, culture, art, neuroscience, cognition, critical thinking, intelligence, creativity, autopoiesis, self-organization, rhizomes, complexity, systems, networks, sustainability, thinkers, ++
Giorgio Bertini does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from these papers, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
4800 Posts in this Blog
- Follow Learning Change on WordPress.com